Judgement Parameters

Bureau Scoring Framework

Our systematic approach to determining objective truth relies on four pillars of forensic analysis.

Logical Consistency

We audit for internal contradictions, logical fallacies (ad hominem, straw man), and the structural integrity of the argument.

Fact-checking claims
Identifying non-sequiturs
Structural validity

Evidence Admissibility

Direct evidence (logs, screenshots) is weighted significantly higher than subjective hearsay or emotional recountings.

Verification of context
Direct vs Indirect claims
Completeness of info

Intent Analysis

We analyze tone and semantics to determine if the intent was to resolve, clarify, or escalate the conflict.

De-escalation attempts
Emotional regulation
Clarity of intent

Objective Fairness

The Bureau's algorithm is blind to the participants' identities. It seeks the truest path to resolution, not the most popular one.

Bias detection
Context sensitivity
Mutual solution focus

"Transparency is our core value. We believe that by showing the logic behind every verdict,
we help users learn to communicate more effectively in the future."